City shells out $6 million to owners of Park Hill golf course

The legal battles are over, but the future for the 155-acre Denver property is as murky as ever.

The Denver skyline stands tall behind the Park Hill Golf Club. (Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite


From the Denverite

The City of Denver reached a settlement with the owners of a golf course in Park Hill this week, forking over $6 million to put an end to a complex series of legal battles.

The settlement ends all of pending litigation over the property but does not add any sort of clarity to the future of the 155 acres of land, which has embroiled the city, open space advocates and the various owners and operators of the golf course for years.

The agreement between the city and the property’s owner, Westside Investment Partners, will maintain a long-standing conservation easement on the land, which prohibits development on the property. The agreement gives Westside at least three years to finalize their plans for the property and start a public engagement process to vet other possible uses for the land. To develop the property, Westside would need to get City Council approval to remove the conservation easement and rezone the property.

According to city officials, the settlement was designed to allow the city to disentangle itself from the legal mess surrounding the golf course, while still giving Denverites some say in what happens on the private property.

“My priorities for the property and for the neighborhood have always been preserving open space and extensive community input. This agreement ensures we will have both,” Mayor Michael Hancock said via a press release Tuesday. “The easement will be preserved while the neighbors who are most impacted by this property will be able to guide its future use.”


INC Parks and Recreation Survey of the Candidates

In February the Parks and Recs Committee developed a series of questions that flowed from the PARC platform.

The questions are below.

1. What is your name please and what office and district are you running for?

2. If you were appointing the Executive Director of Parks and Recreation Department, what education and previous experience would you expect the person to have?

3. Will you support an ordinance moving OS-A zoning from the Ex. Director of Parks back to City Council? If not, why?

4. What would you consider is adequate green space for high density development, for example Elitchs? What steps would you take to ensure the zoning requirement for green space is adequate?

5. The use of recycled water in Denver parks appears to be causing the premature loss of many mature evergreens. Is that an acceptable trade-off for accommodating more population growth or should the city spend money to untie remediation measures to save those legacy trees? Explain your answer.

6. What would you do to protect and enhance waterways going through Denver?

7. What aspect(s) of INC Parks and Rec Urban Platform do you support?

INC PARC Survey Of The Candidates